Heres something to distract you from the climate change/global warming issue. Would you rather know all life on Earth is going to be wiped out, or would you prefer to be surprised? Fans of the unexpected will want the next extinction event to be delivered via an asteroid. Those who want a heads-up will opt for a comet. Why? Astronomers think it possible the first warning we will have that an inbound asteroid is going to strike Earth will be the fireball.
Harvard University scientists have identified a virtual "speed limit" on the rate of molecular evolution in organisms, and the magic number appears to be 6 mutations per genome per generation -- a level beyond which species run the strong risk of extinction as their genomes lose stability. By modelling the stability of proteins required for an organism's survival, Eugene Shakhnovich and his colleagues have discovered this essential thermodynamic limit on a species' rate of evolution. Their discovery, published this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, draws a crucial connection between the physical properties of genetic material and the survival fitness of an entire organism.
"While mathematical genetics research has brought about some remarkable discoveries over the years, these approaches always failed to connect the dots between the reproductive fitness of organisms and the molecular properties of the proteins encoded by their genomes. We've made an important step toward finally bridging the gap between macroscopic and microscopic biology" - Eugene Shakhnovich, professor of chemistry and chemical biology in Harvard's Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
According to Shakhnovich, crucial aspects of an organism's evolutionary fitness can be directly inferred by inspecting its DNA sequences and analysing how the proteins encoded by those sequences fold. DNA sequences encode the order of amino acids in a protein, and amino acids act as the protein's basic building blocks by arranging themselves into a structure that allows the protein to perform its biological function. The research was inspired in part by the longstanding recognition that knocking out essential genes, making them inactive, produces a lethal phenotype, or a physiologically unviable organism.
"From there, we made the simple assumption that in order for an organism to be viable, all of its essential genes -- those that support basic cell operations -- have to encode at least minimally stable proteins. What occurs over the long process of evolution is that random mutations can either encode slightly more or less stable proteins" - Eugene Shakhnovich.
If enough mutations push an essential protein towards an unstable, non-functional structure, the organism will die. Shakhnovich's group found that for most organisms, including viruses and bacteria, an organism's rate of genome mutation must stay below 6 mutations per genome per generation to prevent the accumulation of too many potentially lethal changes in genetic material. The existence of a mutation limit for viruses helps explain how the immune system can perform its function. Because viral replication and survival can only occur at a limited rate, the body has a window of time to develop antibodies against infectious agents. Furthermore, if the mutation rate is high, the size of the genome in question must be small to stay within the bounds of the speed limit -- thus organisms that tend to mutate quickly are those with concise genomes, such as viruses and bacteria. The Shakhnovich speed limit also offers an explanation for observed differences in genome sizes between organisms with genome error correction -- such as bacteria, mammals, birds, and reptiles and those without, such as RNA viruses: In more complex organisms, cells have evolved correction systems to detect and fix errors in DNA replication. These systems drastically reduce the number of mutations per replication, increasing the mutational stability of the genome and allowing more intricate and delicate biological systems to develop without the risk of interruptive mutations.
"It's an interesting corollary because it suggests that there is a fundamental tradeoff between evolutionary security and adaptive flexibility: Larger, more complex organisms have to have error correction to protect organismic viability, but this means the rate of evolution slows down significantly. As organisms become more complex, they have more to lose and can't be as radically experimental with their genomes as some viruses and bacteria" - Eugene Shakhnovich.
The remains of a dodo found in a cave beneath bamboo and tea plantations in Mauritius offer the best chance yet to learn about the extinct flightless bird, a scientist said on Friday. The discovery was made earlier this month in the Mauritian highlands, but the location was kept secret until the recovery of the skeleton, nicknamed "Fred," was completed on Friday. Four men guarded the site overnight. Julian Hume, a palaeontologist at Britain's Natural History Museum, told Reuters the remains were likely to yield excellent DNA and other vital clues, because they were found intact, in isolation and in a cave.
The recent heavy swell of the sea, causing killer waves in Mauritius, Rodrigues and other surrounding islands needs to be given deep thought in so far as natural calamities are concerned. We need to be rightly guided by the Meteorological Department and be prepared to face such phenomena. Natural calamities have been increasing in intensity, ferocity and frequency. It was in December 2004 that we witnessed the ferocious tsunami that hit three continents and killed nearly 200,000 persons besides destroying land and buildings. Hurricane Katrina devastated the Gulf Coast of the US with unprecedented ferocity. The recent South Asian earthquake has taken a toll of nearly 50,000 lives and many more deaths are likely in view of worsening weather. New diseases are threatening humanity. HIV-AIDS is already devouring the African continent and elsewhere. SARS took its toll earlier and the latest threat comes from pandemic avian-flu whose death toll may be a lot, according to experts.
If two Kansas University physicists are correct, things will start getting ugly on Earth in about 10 million to 12 million years.
Increased cloud cover, increased mutations, cancer - Adrian Melott said Friday, ticking off some of the hazards he foresees coming about because of increased exposure to cosmic rays, or radiation.
Melott and KU colleague Mikhail Medvedev have won acclaim in science circles recently for their ideas about how the movement of the galaxy may help account for massive die-offs on Earth on a strikingly regular schedule. For the moment, Melott said, their theory is of medium-large significance in the world of physics and astronomy.
Like most new ideas in science, its probably wrong. If it were to turn out to be right, it would be huge - Adrian Melott.
In 2005, two University of California-Berkeley researchers found by examining fossil records that massive extinctions happen on Earth about once every 62 million years. But an explanation for why that happens has been lacking.
The extinction of the dinosaurs 65 million years ago had little effect on the evolution of mammals, according to a study in the journal Nature. One theory had suggested the rise of the mammals was directly linked to the disappearance of the dinosaurs. The evidence challenging the connection comes from the most complete family tree compiled for mammals. It shows how different groups, such as primates and rodents, are related and when they diverged. An international team compiled the mammal "supertree" from existing fossil data and from genetic analyses. Throughout the Cretaceous Period, when dinosaurs walked the Earth, mammals were relatively few in number, and were prevented from diversifying and evolving in ecosystems dominated by the ancient reptiles.
Species 2000 & ITIS Catalogue of Life has reached one million species - a major milestone in its quest to complete the first up-to-date comprehensive catalogue of all living organisms. The Catalogue of Life, available on CD and on the Internet, is the result of a worldwide collaboration involving so far about 50 contributing databases and the work of 3,000 biologists. The project plans to cover all estimated 1.75 million known species by 2011. The project is led by the University of Reading’s Professor Frank Bisby of the Species 2000 organisation, based at the University’s Centre for Plant Diversity and Systematics, and by Dr Thomas Orrell, of the Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS) based at the Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Washington DC.
The most detailed world map of mammals, birds and amphibians ever produced shows that endangered species from these groups do not inhabit the same geographical areas, says new research published today. Contrary to conservationists' previous assumptions, the map shows conclusively that geographical areas with a high concentration of endangered species from one group, do not necessarily have high numbers from the others. This new finding has far-reaching implications for conservation planning by governments and NGOs, and their decisions about where to focus conservation spending. These decisions have typically been based on the assumption that investing in an area known to have a high concentration of endangered birds, for example, will mean that large numbers of endangered mammal and amphibian species will also be protected. The new study shows that basing conservation decisions on just one type of animal can be very misleading.
So what triggered the mass extinction of the dinosaurs some 65 million years ago? Was it a giant meteor impact or a volcanic activity? Neither of the two, according to a latest study by plant fossil expert Nan Arens of Hobart and William Smith Colleges in New York. According to her, it was not a single activity like a meteor impact or a volcanic eruption but something known as the press/pulse theory of mass extinctions that brought about the end of great lizards. According to the press/pulse theory, “the worst die-offs happen when some sort of interminable, multi-generational pressure on life is combined with a few powerful blows”. She believes some species might already have been vulnerable when the triggering event occurred. To test the idea, she and her undergraduate student Ian West compiled a large database of marine organisms and their extinctions through geological time. They divided the last 488 million years into four groups: Suspected meteor impacts (pulses), gigantic volcanic flood basalt eruptions (presses), periods with neither presses nor pulses, and times when press and pulse coincided, and compared average extinction rates in each of these groups. Flood basalt eruptions are considered "presses" because they release vast amounts of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere and can change the Earth's climate. The researchers found similar extinction rates when a pulse or press occurred by itself, and when neither effect was occurring.
"However, when an impact occurred during a time of volcanic flood — that produced higher extinction rates"