* Astronomy

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Pioneer 10 and 11


L

Posts: 131433
Date:
Pioneer Anomaly
Permalink  
 


Title: The impact of the Kuiper Belt Objects and of the asteroid ring on future high-precision relativistic Solar System tests
Authors: Lorenzo Iorio
(Version v4)

We preliminarily investigate the impact of the Kuiper Belt Objects (KBOs) and of the asteroid ring on some proposed high-precision tests of Newtonian and post-Newtonian gravity to be performed in the Solar System by means of spacecraft in heliocentric ~ 1 AU orbits and accurate orbit determination of some of the inner planets. It turns out that the Classical KBOSs (CKBOS), which amount to ~ 70% of the observed population of Trans-Neptunian bodies, induce a systematic secular error of about 1 m after one year in the transverse direction T of the orbit of a test particle orbiting at 1 AU from the Sun. For Mercury the ratios of the secular perihelion precessions induced by CKBOs to the ones induced by the general relativity and the solar oblateness J_2 amount to 6 10^-7 and 8 10^-4, respectively. The secular transverse perturbation induced on a ~ 1 AU orbit by the asteroid ring, which globally accounts for the action of the minor asteroids whose mass is about 5 10^-10 solar masses, is 10 m yr^-1; the bias on the relativistic and J_2 Mercury perihelion precessions is 6.1 10^-6 and 1 10^-2, respectively. Given the very ambitious goals of many expensive and complex missions aimed to testing gravitational theories to unprecedented levels of accuracy, these notes may suggest further and more accurate investigations of such sources of potentially insidious systematic bias.

Read more (7kb, PDF)

__________________


L

Posts: 131433
Date:
Permalink  
 

Title: The Lense-Thirring effect and the Pioneer anomaly: Solar System tests
Authors: Lorenzo Iorio

Here we report on a 6% test of the general relativistic gravitomagnetic Lense-Thirring effect in the gravitational field of Mars with the Mars Global Surveyor (MGS) spacecraft and on certain features of motion of Uranus, Neptune and Pluto which contradict the hypothesis that the Pioneer anomaly can be caused by some gravitational mechanism.

Read more (17kb, PDF)

__________________


L

Posts: 131433
Date:
Permalink  
 

According to Michael Nieto of the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico, the data for Pioneer 10 was not precise enough around the time of its fly-by of Jupiter to indicate whether its acceleration problems began with that encounter. But, this may soon be remedied. JPL's Slava Turyshev recently unearthed archived data from Pioneer 10 and 11 and is reconstructing the missions in their entirety, which could help determine whether Pioneer 10's anomaly began with a fly-by too.

"That's what I want to look at more precisely" - Michael Nieto .

The researchers say that while it is possible that an overlooked effect from ordinary physics might account for the anomalies, something more exotic could also be involved. For example, the spacecraft trajectories could be influenced by the presence of dark matter in the solar system. Or maybe the laws of gravity need reworking.
Peter Antreasian, a spacecraft navigation expert at JPL who along with Joseph Guinn first brought attention to the anomalies seen in Galileo and NEAR during their Earth fly-bys, believes that it will require a modified law of gravity or other new physics to explain it. He does not think it is connected to the Pioneer anomaly, since the force behind this seems always to point in the same direction, back towards the sun. In the Earth fly-bys, by contrast, "a directional force such as the Pioneer anomalous force would have been very evident in the radiometric data in the last few days before the approach". Whatever causes this anomaly seems to make its impact just a few minutes before the closest approach to Earth.
Not everyone is convinced the Earth fly-by anomaly points to new physics. Myles Standish, who calculates trajectories of solar system bodies for JPL, says he feels the Earth fly-by anomaly is almost certainly due to an error in measurement or an incomplete analysis using ordinary physics

Source New Scientist

__________________


L

Posts: 131433
Date:
RE: Pioneer 10 and 11
Permalink  
 


Title: Pioneer Anomaly and the Kuiper Belt mass distribution
Authors: O. Bertolami, P. Vieira
UPDATE

Pioneer 10 and 11 were the first probes sent to study the outer planets of the Solar System and Pioneer 10 was the first spacecraft to leave the Solar System. Besides their already epic journeys, Pioneer 10 and 11 spacecraft were subjected to an unaccounted effect interpreted as a constant acceleration toward the Sun, the so-called Pioneer anomaly. One of the possibilities put forward for explaining the Pioneer anomaly is the gravitational acceleration of the Kuiper Belt.
In this work the researchers examine this hypothesis for various models for the Kuiper Belt mass distribution. They find that the gravitational effect due to the Kuiper Belt cannot account for the Pioneer anomaly. Furthermore, they have also studied the hypothesis that drag forces can explain the Pioneer anomaly; however they conclude that the density required for producing the Pioneer anomaly is many orders of magnitude greater than those of interplanetary and interstellar dust.
Their conclusions suggest that only through a mission, the Pioneer anomaly can be confirmed and further investigated. If a mission with these aims is ever sent to space, it turns out, on account of their results, that it will be also a quite interesting probe to study the mass distribution of the Kuiper Belt.

Read more (90kb, PDF)

__________________


L

Posts: 131433
Date:
Pioneer Anomaly
Permalink  
 


There's a mystery at the edge of our solar system. Two spacecraft, Pioneers 10 and 11, which were launched to Jupiter and Saturn more than 30 years ago, are hurtling towards the edge of our solar system -- but at a slower than expected rate. Called the "Pioneer Anomaly," the effect of this slowing is small, but measurable, and so far unexplained.

This riddle has sparked an array of possible explanations, ranging from dark matter to spacecraft equipment to - most provocative of all - a new physics.
"More data" is what scientists need to solve the mystery, and more data is what they now possess, thanks to Planetary Society members.

Only a fraction of the Pioneer spacecraft navigational data have ever been analysed to study this anomaly. But much of the more than 30 years of mission data was in disarray, on ancient media, and in danger of being destroyed. That's where The Planetary Society's members stepped in.
Only about 11 years of the Pioneer Doppler data, which measured the spacecrafts' velocity through the Doppler shift of the received frequency of the Pioneer signal, had been analysed, and no solution to the slowdown had been determined. Much of the remaining data was stored on old 7- and 9-track magnetic tapes and needed to be identified, recovered and saved. No NASA funding was available for that task.
The Planetary Society issued an appeal to its worldwide membership and raised the funding needed to recover and validate this trove of information.

"We were happy to come to the rescue when no one else would. Whether the new data show the anomaly to be caused by some mundane effect from the spacecraft itself or lead to a new understanding of physics, the Pioneer Anomaly has been a mystery calling out to be solved." - Bruce Betts, Project Manager of The Planetary Society.

After The Planetary Society initiated the project, the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) also contributed in-house funds to further support the Pioneer Anomaly team. Scientists and engineers led by Slava G. Turyshev at JPL were able to recover much of the more-than-30-year navigational histories of both spacecraft, including data from their Jupiter and Saturn encounters in the 1970s. The data are now being collected, arranged, validated, and written to modern media and will be provided to teams of scientists to analyse.
Success extended beyond the recovery of the velocity data. Information about the spacecraft themselves, as well as science data, were contained in what are called Master Data Records (MDRs), discovered in storage at NASA Ames Research Centre (which operated the Pioneer spacecraft). Original plans called for that data to be kept for 7 years, but fortunately, many records were turned up in the search for more data. Thanks to Viktor Toth, a software designer from Canada, these telemetry data files are also being collected and arranged, all useful data is being extracted, and they are being written to modern media.

What can these additional data tell scientists? For one thing, MDR data include temperatures measured throughout the spacecraft during the course of the missions. These will be critical for modelling the thermal radiation from the spacecraft, its variations over time, and whether it could help explain the anomaly. Planetary Society college intern Merek Chertkow is beginning to analyse this information, as are various professional scientists.
The Pioneer Anomaly was discovered when John D. Anderson and colleagues at JPL realised that the trajectories of the two spacecraft were deviating from the known laws of motion. After about 30 years of travel, the Pioneer Anomaly has resulted in the spacecraft being about 240,000 miles (the Earth Moon distance) closer to the Sun than we would expect. That may sound like a trivial amount when one considers the Pioneer spacecraft are travelling at 30,000 miles per hour, but scientists were intrigued because no known factor explained the slowdown.

What could be affecting their speed? Many hypotheses have been suggested:

*the interplanetary plasma and solar wind
*thermal recoil force due to heat from the spacecraft's nuclear power sources
*mysterious Dark Matter in the galaxy
*a manifestation of new physics

No hypothesis could be adequately explained by known data, but with the data saved with the help of The Planetary Society, scientists will now have far more information available to help them solve the Pioneer Anomaly.

Source

__________________


L

Posts: 131433
Date:
Permalink  
 

Title: Could the Pioneer anomaly have a gravitational origin?
Authors: Kjell Tangen

If the Pioneer anomaly has a gravitational origin, it would, according to the equivalence principle, distort the motions of the planets in the Solar System. Since no anomalous motion of the planets have been detected, it is generally believed that the Pioneer anomaly can not originate from a gravitational source in the Solar System. However, this conclusion becomes less obvious when considering models that either imply modifications to gravity at long range or gravitational sources localised to the outer Solar System, given the uncertainty in the orbital parameters of the outer planets.
Following the general assumption that the Pioneer spacecrafts move geodesically in a spherically symmetric spacetime metric, the researchers derive the metric disturbance that is needed in order to account for the Pioneer anomaly. They then analyse the residual effects on the astronomical observables of the outer planets that would arise from this metric disturbance, given an arbitrary metric theory of gravity.
The computed residuals are much larger than the observed residuals, and they are lead to the conclusion that the Pioneer anomaly can not originate from a metric disturbance and therefore that the motion of the Pioneer spacecrafts must be non-geodesic.
Since their results are model independent, they can be applied to rule out any model of the Pioneer anomaly that implies that the Pioneer spacecrafts move geodesically in a perturbed spacetime metric, regardless of the origin of this metric disturbance.


Read more (PDF)

__________________


L

Posts: 131433
Date:
RE: Pioneer 10 and 11
Permalink  
 


Study of the anomalous acceleration of Pioneer 10 and 11
Authors: John D. Anderson, Philip A. Laing, Eunice L. Lau, Anthony S. Liu,
Michael Martin Nieto, Slava G. Turyshev

Previous analyses of radio Doppler and ranging data from distant spacecraft in the solar system indicated that an apparent anomalous acceleration is acting on Pioneer 10 and 11, with a magnitude a_P ~ 8 x 10^-8 cm/s^2, directed towards the Sun. Much effort has been expended looking for possible systematic origins of the residuals, but none has been found.

A detailed investigation of effects both external to and internal to the spacecraft, as well as those due to modelling and computational techniques, is provided. The researchers also discuss the methods, theoretical models, and experimental techniques used to detect and study small forces acting on interplanetary spacecraft. These include the methods of radio Doppler data collection, data editing, and data reduction.
There is now further data for the Pioneer 10 orbit determination. The extended Pioneer 10 data set spans 3 January 1987 to 22 July 1998.
(For Pioneer 11 the shorter span goes from 5 January 1987 to the time of loss of coherent data on 1 October 1990.)
With these data sets and more detailed studies of all the systematics, they now give a result, of a_P = (8.74 ± 1.33) x 10^-8 cm/s^2. (Annual/diurnal variations on top of a_P, that leave a_P unchanged, are also reported and discussed.)

ReadMore (PDF)



__________________


L

Posts: 131433
Date:
Permalink  
 

Indepth study of the anomalous acceleration of Pioneer 10 and 11
Read More ( 1.5 Mb PDF)




__________________


L

Posts: 131433
Date:
RE: Pioneer anomaly
Permalink  
 


Very soon, NASA will be dismantling and scrapping its only computer left which is able to access and process the data on its ancient 7- and 9-track magnetic tapes.
The data held on these few hundred tapes contain the complete archive of the first 15 years of all the data returned to Earth by the Pioneer spacecraft which were sent into interstellar space.

This additional and thus far unexamined data (the data after 1988 is available and has already been examined) may hold the key to solving what is considered one of the top problems in physics today, the so called Pioneer anomaly, where the observed trajectory of these spacecraft (and a couple others) deviates noticeably from calculated expectation.
The reason for the anomaly may be as mundane as uneven radiation pressure or escaping thruster fuel or it may be as groundbreaking as a clue to completely new physics, perhaps related to dark matter or dark energy.
The Planetary Society is planning on recovering this data and meticulously examine it to look for something which may have been missed or hidden from current investigations into the phenomenon.
They need money to do this, about $250,000, and are asking for donations to fund the project.
There are no serious proposals to send any more spin-stabilized spacecraft on solar escape trajectories any time in the near future and this is probably the only tenable method we have to directly investigate this mystery in the interim.

https://planetary.org/donations.html

__________________


L

Posts: 131433
Date:
RE: Pioneer 10 and 11
Permalink  
 


Origin of the Blueshift in Signals from Pioneer 10 and 11
Authors:
Kris Krogh

A previous paper introduced a quantum-mechanical theory of gravity, and showed it agrees with the standard experimental tests of general relativity.
Doppler tracking signals returned by the Pioneer 10 and 11 space probes and extensive further analysis of the Pioneer 10 data by Anderson, Laing, Lau, Liu, Neito and Turyshev arrived at (8.74 ± 1.33)×10-8cm/s2, in the approximate direction of the Sun and Earth.
This effect hasn’t been reconciled with general relativity.
According to general relativity, space-time is curved by mass-energy.
Quantum mechanics says space is filled with vacuum energy. Yet measurements of the universe’s large-scale curvature show none.

While unexplained by general relativity or prevailing cosmology, it's shown this effect is predicted by the quantum-mechanical alternative.
Instead of curving space-time, the fundamental effect of gravitational potentials
in this theory is a slowing of quantum-mechanical waves.
Where Einstein assumed an absolute speed of light, with space and time variable, the assumption here is
the opposite.

Read More (PDF)

__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4 5  >  Last»  | Page of 5  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard