Title: Universal Doomsday: Analyzing Our Prospects for Survival Authors: Austin Gerig, Ken D. Olum, Alexander Vilenkin
Given a sufficiently large universe, numerous civilisations almost surely exist. Some of these civilisations will be short-lived and die out relatively early in their development, i.e., before having the chance to spread to other planets. Others will be long-lived, potentially colonising their galaxy and becoming enormous in size. What fraction of civilisations in the universe are long-lived? The "universal doomsday" argument states that long-lived civilisations must be rare because if they were not, we should find ourselves living in one. Furthermore, because long-lived civilisations are rare, our civilisation's prospects for long-term survival are poor. Here, we develop the formalism required for universal doomsday calculations and show that while the argument has some force, our future is not as gloomy as the traditional doomsday argument would suggest, at least when the number of early existential threats is small.
Title: The Doomsday Argument in Many Worlds Authors: Austin Gerig
You and I are highly unlikely to exist in a civilization that has produced only 70 billion people, yet we find ourselves in just such a civilization. Our circumstance, which seems difficult to explain, is easily accounted for if (1) many other civilizations exist and if (2) nearly all of these civilizations (including our own) die out sooner than usually thought, i.e., before trillions of people are produced. Because the combination of (1) and (2) make our situation likely and alternatives do not, we should drastically increase our belief that (1) and (2) are true. These results follow immediately when considering a many worlds version of the "Doomsday Argument" and are immune to the main criticism of the original Doomsday Argument.