The shuttle Atlantis and its crew of seven astronauts will return to Earth before the Pentagon attempts to shoot down a rogue spy satellite NASA Administrator Michael Griffin said Thursday. Read more
A plan by the US government to shoot down an out-of-control spy satellite has been described as a cynical tit-for-tat move in response to China doing the same last year. Scientists and arms-control experts fear that the operation will create damaging debris and weaken international efforts to ban space weaponry.
The US President has ordered the US Navy to shoot down a damaged spy satellite that will be entering the earths atmosphere at either the end of February or the beginning of March. The spy satellite in question is an advanced next generation satellite that was launch with a Delta II rocket in late 2006. After the satellite was launched it immediately began to malfunction and has never been operational, or controllable. The decision to bring it down with missiles is based on several concerns.
1. Human Health & Safety: The damaged satellite might reenter orbit with hundreds of gallons of rocket fuel that is made of Hydrazine. Hydrazine has an ammonia like effect on the respiratory system. 2. Missile Defence Test/Demonstration: The launch platform for this is a part of the US missile defence system that has not received allot of support from congress. It would be a demonstration of the missile defence system capabilities.
Less than a month ago, White House officials said a falling spy satellite would likely pose little threat to humans but on Thursday, the Pentagon said President Bush himself approved an unorthodox plan to destroy the satellite with a missile strike. What could warrant such a change of heart? It's the realisation that the spacecraft could be bringing a toxic iceberg back down to Earth. Pentagon officials said it was that safety concern, rather than the intention to test a potential anti-satellite weapon, which led them to develop the plan for a missile intercept.
The 'shot' -- thats what Ambassador James Jeffrey called the decision to use an an Aegis SM-3 to try to shoot down satellite USA 193 in the next 3-12 days.
Initially the administration believed that the danger from the falling satellite did not pose a large problem, but decided it was best to shoot it down when experts decided that the unused hydrazine did pose a danger. Read more
When the government announced last month that a top-secret spy satellite would, in the next few months, come falling out of the sky, American officials said there was little risk to people because satellites fall out of orbit fairly frequently and much of the planet is covered by oceans. But they said precious little about the satellite itself.